Comedy and tragedy coexist in tragicomedies. This means that the work includes amusing scenarios that will make the spectator or reader laugh or smile as well as those that will make them sad or uncomfortable due to tragic circumstances or happenings. The story may have a number of terrible incidents, but it usually has a joyful ending—typically following a string of misfortunes. The majority of the characters’ actions and statements are exaggerated, and jokes are woven throughout the narrative to lift the mood.
Waiting for Godot as a tragicomedy:
An excellent example of a tragicomedy is Waiting for Godot, which is seen as being under the umbrella of Absurd Theater. Because of the black humor—humor brought on by something genuinely painful—Beckett himself referred to this play as a tragicomedy in two acts. Beckett himself referred to this play as a tragicomedy in two acts. The play has a lot to move us, but it also has a lot to make us laugh. Then there are those events and utterances that both affect and amuse us. In fact, it is a peculiar drama in which it becomes challenging to distinguish between the light and humorous components and the sad and tragic ones. The characters themselves are humorous and tragic in equal measure; we sympathize with them while also finding humor in their surroundings and conversations. Estragon and Vladimir, our two characters, find themselves in an odd predicament as they wait for Godot but are unsure of his identity or the purpose of their wait. They don’t even know what would happen if Godot showed up. The play examines their interactions and features amusing scenes and language.
Read More: Waiting for Godot as an absurd play
Waiting for Godot as a comedy:
In “Waiting for Godot“, the characters are neither enjoying joyfully nor feeling happy without smiling; they are in-between; attempting to make sense of their surroundings. Vladimir declares at one point that it is both mentally and physically harmful to laugh.
Estragon plays about with his boots in the beginning of the play, taking them off and putting them back on repeatedly. The following scene shows Vladimir repeatedly fiddling with his hat, pulling it off to look inside. On another occasion, Vladimir and Estragon exchange hats.
Read More: Theatre of Absurd
These movements were adapted from the convention of circus performances. A lot of what the two guys do is rather absurd, as when Estragon tells Vladimir to urinate outside the theater. Their conversations flow continuously like a comic paradigm.
Waiting for Godot as a tragedy:
The reader also perceives the hopelessness and absurdity that permeate all of the play’s characters. What happens in the play are sorts of situations that recur repeatedly throughout the play rather than discrete occurrences with a clear beginning and end. As “nothing happens, nobody comes, and nobody goes,” there is a certain level of circularity. For instance, Estragon receives daily beatings. Both tramps have severe health issues, are in chronic discomfort, and talk about how much it hurts. Estragon has continuous troubles with his feet, while Vladimir struggles to urinate due to issues with his prostate. Carrots, radishes, and turnips are the only foods that either character needs to survive. They basically have sad lives and take comfort in doing nothing. “Do not let us do anything, it’s safer”, says Estragon.
Read More: Existentialism in English Literature
Vladimir and Estragon’s anguish is made worse by their consideration of suicide as well as by the sad events that befell Lucky and Pozzo, two of their fellow characters. These two appear even less important than our main protagonists, and Lucky’s name, which ironically describes his real situation—that he will be sold by Pozzo—is particularly sarcastic. The misery is further accentuated by the sense of helplessness and hopelessness that surrounds our two protagonists. Estragon says, for instance, “Nothing happens, nobody comes, nobody goes, it’s awful.”
The meaninglessness of modern world:
The play conveys a feeling of futility and the weariness that all humans must endure throughout their lives. Beckett does a good job of capturing the meaninglessness of modern existence. Due to this, the play is pervaded by a sense of hopelessness, which is itself tragic, even while comical circumstances are employed to fit the author’s intention of a tragicomedy.
Read More: Willy Loman as a tragic hero
The play is full of useless conversation, senseless wordplay, and characters who suddenly change their thoughts and forget everything, including their own identities and the events of yesterday. All of this adds to the play’s overall absurdist humor. This humor is, however, frequently uncomfortable combined with sorrowful or serious topics to create a darker type of comedy.
Estragon mentions being thrashed by an unnamed “they” while making reference to “billions of others” who have died. Lucky, whose unfortunate name is also darkly humorous, receives appalling treatment and is physically beaten on stage. And Estragon and Vladimir casually and amicably discuss suicide. The audience is uneasy as a result of all of this because of the strange blending of humor and tragedy, seriousness and fun. One daren’t even laugh anymore, Vladimir declares in act one, and this statement may be used to describe the audience of Beckett’s play, who are unsure whether to smile or cry at the actions on stage. The absurdity that results from the seeming discrepancy between the tones used by characters and the subject matter of their speech might be interpreted as a response to a world devoid of purpose and meaning. It makes no sense to view the world as comedic or tragic, nice or horrible, if it has no purpose. Thus, Beckett offers a disturbing play that awkwardly balances the line between tragedy and humor, in what can only be described as the absurd.
Read More: Death of the Salesman as a modern tragedy
In conclusion, we can say that “Waiting for Godot” is largely a tragic and, at the same time, a humorous work. The potential of Vladimir and Estragon’s suicide is heartbreaking, but the reasons they have for not succeeding in their goal are humorous: sometimes they think the tree is too weak, and other times they don’t have the right rope. The monologue of Lucky is another example; it is humorous due to its frenzied incoherence but terrifying since it predicts the extinction of mankind. The fact that Lucky can only “think” while wearing his hat is especially humorous. As a result, anytime he has to be restrained from speaking more, his hat must be taken from him. The tramps’ choice to leave at the end of both Acts I and II and their inaction despite the decision serve to further emphasize the play’s both tragic and comic aspects.
- What is the frame narrative of The Canterbury Tales?
- The Wife of Bath’s Tale and character analysis
- Elizabethan Poetry characteristics
- Waiting for Godot as an tragicomedy
- Restoration Comedy | Comedy of Manners characteristics